Platform Comparison

1/ST BET vs FanDuel Racing

Side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right platform.

Comparison last updated:
Best overall

1/ST BET has the stronger overall profile

1/ST BET grades better on the weighted mix of trust score, payout reliability, bonus posture, and regional reach. FanDuel Racing can still be the better fit if one of its specific strengths matters more to you than the overall balance.

Open full comparison
  • 1/ST BET trust score: 76/100
  • 1/ST BET payout profile: See platform details
  • 1/ST BET bonus posture: See current racing offer

Comparison at a glance

1S

1/ST BET

Best overall

1/ST BET is the consumer-facing advance-deposit wagering brand from 1/ST for horse-racing bettors.

Trust Score
76/100
Rating
4.0/5
Signup Bonus
See current racing offer
Withdrawal Speed
Not verified
Regions available
51 states + 13 provinces/territories
Licensed
Horse Racing
51 states + 13 provinces/territories
Review: Verified
Bonus: None found
Fact-checked 2026-04-17Reviewed by BonusBell Racing & Prediction Markets Desk

FanDuel Racing

Bet on horse racing with FanDuel. No Sweat First Bet up to $500.

Trust Score
48/100
Rating
4.8/5
Signup Bonus
No Sweat First Bet up to $500 (bet back as bonus if lost)
Withdrawal Speed
PayPal 24-48hrs; ACH 2-5 days
Regions available
19 states
Licensed
Horse Racing
19 states
Review: Verified
Bonus: None found
Fact-checked 2026-04-19Reviewed by BonusBell Racing & Prediction Markets Desk

Field-by-field comparison

Use this section when the overall verdict is close or when one specific factor matters more than the aggregate score.

Rating

1/ST BET

4.0/5

FanDuel Racing

4.8/5

Trust Score

1/ST BET

76/100

FanDuel Racing

48/100

Review Coverage

1/ST BET

Verified

FanDuel Racing

Verified

Bonus Coverage

1/ST BET

None found

FanDuel Racing

None found

Last Fact-check

1/ST BET

2026-04-17

FanDuel Racing

2026-04-19

Signup Bonus

1/ST BET

See current racing offer

FanDuel Racing

No Sweat First Bet up to $500 (bet back as bonus if lost)

Market

1/ST BET

Horse racing

FanDuel Racing

Horse racing

Regulatory Type

1/ST BET

LICENSED

FanDuel Racing

LICENSED

Founded

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

2023

Parent Company

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

Flutter Entertainment

Min Deposit

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

$10

Min Withdrawal

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

Withdrawal Speed

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

PayPal 24-48hrs; ACH 2-5 days

Mobile App

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

Live Chat

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

Bonus Codes

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

License

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

{"states":["AZ","CO","IL","IN","IA","KS","LA","MD","MA","MI","MS","NJ","NY","OH","PA","TN","VA","WV","WY"],"excludedStates":["TX","NV","CA"],"licenseType":"Multi-state LICENSED","year":"2023"}

Regions available

1/ST BET

64

FanDuel Racing

19

Payment Methods

1/ST BET

FanDuel Racing

5 methods

The table below compares 1/ST BET and FanDuel Racing across the same core discovery metrics: rating, trust score, bonus posture, market type, regulatory posture, founding year, banking minimums, payout speed, app/support signals, licensing, regional reach, and payment-method breadth.

Start with province, territory, or regional availability and regulatory type, then use trust score, payout speed, and bonus posture as your next filters. Trust score is always shown on a 0-100 scale here, and it should be treated as a risk floor rather than a tiny tiebreaker between two otherwise similar platforms.

If you want a narrative head-to-head, open the canonical comparison page. You can also browse 406 tracked platforms or jump to Canada rankings when regional eligibility matters more than national positioning.

1/ST BET

Pros

  • 1/ST family product
  • Horse-racing focused wallet
  • Official app + site

Cons

  • Support surface is not fully verified in the current catalog
  • Cashier details are still incomplete in the current structured data

FanDuel Racing

Pros

  • Superior mobile experience; seamless Flutter integration with main sportsbook; excellent live streaming

Cons

  • Limited to Flutter states; newer platform may lack historical data depth